|
Wednesday, August 31. 2005
I have the song Speed of Sound from the Coldplay album “X&Y” stuck in my head. I don’t know the words, and the music won’t go away. This happens frequently to me, when a new piece of music somehow synchronizes perfectly with the events of my life. This album will forever be the soundtrack for these few weeks, just the way Joni Mitchell’s song My Secret Place will forever be connected to the fall of 1991, when I went on a different kind of retreat, and began to come to terms with my alcoholism.
A couple of weeks ago, at the end of a vacation trip to New Hampshire, exhausted and stressed out and parenting solo with both kids, Fix You from this Coldplay album came on the radio as I was standing in the kitchen. I had just yelled at Griffen, my six year old, and I was feeling really low. I stood there in a place I love and cried to this music. Ella, my two year old, wandered in to the kitchen and watched me quietly. The song touches me because I know something of it’s genesis. Chris Martin, the lead singer of Coldplay, is married to the actress Gwyneth Paltrow. Her father died within the last two years, and the song Fix You was born in part out of Chris being confronted by Gwyneth’s deep despair over her father’s death. Somehow this little window into that song opened me up to it, and I felt Coldplay was trying to fix me that night in New Hampshire.
God took Gwyneth’s Dad away and put her in a despair beyond reaching. But her lover reached anyway, and out of that reach came a song, and through that song, God reached into my heart years later and unlocked my sadness. This is how God speaks to me, across time, through art, through others, sometimes others I will never know. This is how God feels to me, with feelings that change me. God did this to me through Ricki Lee Jones’ cover of My Funny Valentine off her EP “Girl at her Volcano”. In the summer of 1984, trying to drink a different sadness away, I played this song in order to sob. And it always worked. But I was drunk and the release was not a real one. Only years later did I realize that Ricki Lee was probably drunk when that song was recorded. These connections bring me closer to her and to Chris and Gwyneth, to the point that I can write about them almost as if they’re my friends. These connections create a spirit community between us through art.
Sunday, August 28. 2005
Last night, my friend Miles W. called to offer me a job teaching improvisation classes at Arcadia University. The regular teacher has been busted under suspicion of running a bicycle currier service to deliver marijuana to people. After having a good laugh about where we were going to buy our pot now, we got to talking about the opportunity. It seemed obvious: take the two classes, it’s a foot in the door at another local University, one where dear friends work in a growing theatre department. But after a closer look, I passed. I would have had to drop out of the two shows I’ve already been cast in this fall. This appointment would be as an adjunct faculty member, and though I’d make a little more money, I would have no benefits. Through Actor’s Equity, the union I’m a member of, I get health insurance as long as I keep working. So taking the teaching job would have meant giving up health insurance. And the course I’d be teaching – two semester-long sections on improvisation – is not a curriculum I have a lot of experience in.
I had to turn down two other adjunct job offers this summer from the University of the Arts, another place I’d really like to teach. They offered me two positions I wasn’t qualified to teach. In that case, I’d have made less money and had to give up my health benefits. But this is how higher education stays afloat, on the backs of a small army of teachers working for peanuts and no benefits, while tenured faculty with bloated salaries coast along. Yes friends, I have a chip on my shoulder. But really, it’s an awful situation.
And it was no small issue to me that I would have had to give up acting. I would have had to drop out of productions I had made commitments to, putting a theatre company that has stood by me in a time of crisis in a tough spot. But it was the letting go of the acting that was really gnawing at me. In spite of the hardships we are working through, I am really looking forward to being a working actor again this year. At a central place in me, it is who I am: an actor. And not a teacher? No, my mission is to prove that I can do both. The mission isn’t going so well these days.
Friends, it’s not just the thrill of performing and the sweet sound of applause that draws me. Certainly that’s an attraction – I couldn’t be an actor if it wasn’t. But now at mid life, I see that acting has engraved some virtues into my being. Acting has made me who I am in some vital and important ways, and I feel as attached to acting as, say, an E.R. doctor feels to her calling, or a priest to his vocation. Not only for the good it does in the world and the delight one feels from doing it well, but out of a sense of supporting a noble tradition, a lineage that has given me so much, and deserves attention in return.
Acting has made me brave in the face of fear. Acting has made me tough in the face of disappointment. Acting has made me faithful in the face of the unknown. Acting has made me love laughter, the way one loves a home, as a source of strength and renewal. Acting has taught me compassion and tolerance through the roles I’ve played and the situations I’ve encountered on stage. Acting has taught me to play well with others. Acting has shown me that I must make choices, and that the making and enacting them is often much more important than their “rightness” or “wrongness”. Acting has made me love myself, showing me that I am best when I am true to who I am. Then, paradoxically, I can become anyone you want me to be.
I am being led to a pedagogy of actor training which is based on identifying and nurturing virtues, rather than analyzing scripts. Do you see, friends, how this is connected to my Quakerism? I don’t believe the answer is in the text. The answer – if such a thing actually exists – is in the person. And for the actor, that answer lies more in the heart than in the mind. So my query now is: how to teach acting from the heart?
The attraction of teaching from the mind, what I call “intellect-based” actor training, and the main reason it dominates higher education is that it can be written about and articulated much more easily. Intellectual activity is the province of words and ideas, which can be put down on paper and understood. This is at the center of university learning: the ability to take something off a page and acquire it as insight or understanding. Certainly, there are other forms of learning in higher education: more experiential learning modes in the natural and social sciences, for instance. But on the whole, we want approaches to teaching that fit the page. If it fits the page, it can be judged and assessed.
The kind of actor training I’m thinking about is very hard to describe, harder to assess. When one attaches words to it, it instantly sounds trite. I want my students to discover their own innate courage through the process of acting. I want them grow tolerant and compassionate of other human experience through the roles they play. I want them to place acting and theatre in a world-wide context, as an artistic discipline that has the potential to make the world a better place. How does one assemble a collection of virtues and use them to guide creative process? Then it occurred to me that one of the other places in which virtues are promoted and used as guiding principles is religion. Revival, then, is my attempt to apply some Quaker virtues to theatrical creative process, and see if the mix results in anything interesting. Revival is my first foray into teaching acting from the heart.
|